Archive for 七月 24th, 2011

24
七月

《功夫熊貓2》

   Posted by: admin    in 影評試影室, 香港影評人協會

對自我身份的追尋

曉龍

上集《功夫熊貓》模仿成龍多年前的《醉拳》,講述主角阿寶接受訓練的過程;《功夫熊貓2》繼續參考成龍電影,以《我是誰》為題,讓阿寶開展尋找自我的旅程。在成長階段中,特別是青少年階段,我們都會懂得對自己的人生和各種相關的價值取向進行哲理性思考,思想種種與生命有關的難題,包括:何謂自己?甚麼是自我?如何找到自我?為何要追尋自我?自己在社會中的存在有何意義?自己在社會內微不足道還是能對整個社會作出重大的貢獻?個人如何與社會建立密切的關係?凡此種種問題,都會困擾青少年。

阿寶雖然是一隻熊貓,但在荷里活動畫電影傾向擬人化的大前提下,牠同樣會受上述問題困擾。例如:片中的牠追溯自己的身世時,經常懷疑自己是誰,又會因自己出生背景不詳而對自我的定義及找尋自我的方法摸不著頭腦,更會因自己「特殊」的過去而懷疑自己存在的意義,亦想不透自己應如何在複雜的社會中自處,以及怎樣主動與社會建立「親密」的關係。因此,牠陷入一片迷惘的困境中,與《我》內已失憶的成龍的心理狀態十分相似。

此外,每當阿寶與沈老大面對面決戰,到了關鍵時刻,阿寶總心不在焉,突然想起自己的過去,繼而進入不知所措的「發呆」狀態。牠產生這種反應,除了因為沈老大對牠的身世之迷略知一二外,還源於牠背景不明而自自然然衍生的自卑感。由於牠不清楚自己是誰,雖然已學會一身好功夫,但仍不能肯定自己真正的價值所在,當牠得知沈老大與牠的父母有關連時,就會認為獲取自己出生背景的資料比殺死仇敵更加重要。故牠在沈老大面前,經常處於兩難的局面,為了大眾的利益和福祉,殺死沈老大可一了百了地為大眾解決難題,但要付出「永遠不知道自己身世」的沉重代價;如果不殺沈老大,就會讓牠繼續遺害人間,使生靈塗炭,雖然阿寶有機會得知自己身世的秘密,但牠會被其他同伴甚至所有動物譴責,因為這是一個極度自私的決定。

對阿寶而言,揭露和了解自己的身世具有很大的「誘惑性」,不單令牠失去「拯救萬民」的良知,還會使牠苦思自己的根源,失去對自我身份的認同以致不能放下自己對過去的執著。要在武功以至心理層面上達致心平氣和,牠必須視「一切如浮雲」,隨寓而安,活在當下,只有這樣,牠才能發揮自己最大的力量,成功擊敗沈老大。因此,片末牠雖然已對自己的身世有少許的了解,但在這次沈老大給予牠的「歷練」過程中,牠最大的得著就是學懂如何順應自然,放下一切,樂天知命地過活,就像太極功夫中道家精神的核心-「禍兮福所倚,福兮禍所伏」,對禍與福的來臨處之泰然。由此可見,「安於現狀,順應命運而行」不單是阿寶的心理狀態產生變化後所衍生的生命觀,這亦是《功2》的創作人貫徹始終地宣揚的人生態度。

24
七月

Wu Xia

   Posted by: admin    in 來稿, 影評試影室, 香港影評人協會

Before watching Director Peter Ho-sun Chan’s latest movie, Wu Xia, starring Donnie Yen, I expected to watch a typical martial arts movie. Contrary to my expectations, the movie is a fascinating fusion of a detective story, forensic science, action, humor, politics and family drama.

Wu Xia is a gripping story about the dark side of human nature. There are several intriguing things that are worth nothing. First, Detective Xu Baijiu believes that the law is more important than humanity. His blind obedience to the law contrasts sharply with the corrupt officials accepting bribes, which is a political satire. Please note what happens to the villain at the end, which ridicules the unscrupulous legal system invented by humans. Second, the difference between humans and animals is highlighted. Please note that cows, horses, flies and worms are shown in the movie and respect for animals is emphasized. Moreover, in a fighting scene, Kara Hui’s character can be seen through a cow’s eye, which symbolically shows her ruthless character. Third, in some scenes, the candles glimmer in the darkness, which symbolically shows the struggle between good and evil in a human being.

Peter Chan and Oi-wah Lam have grasped the key to writing a good story. Indeed, three-dimensional characters are more important than fancy fight scenes, so they take their time developing the characters in the movie. Thanks to the capable cast, the well-crafted script, the restrained costumes and the breathtaking setting, most characters are lifelike. In the movie, Takeshi Kaneshiro gives the most memorable performance, considering his dual role as his good self and his dark self. Detective Xu Baijiu, whose biggest battle lies within, is torn between his conscience and his blind faith in the law. Also, his attempt to speak the Sichuan dialect is comical. As for Donnie Yen, he is charismatic and his action is well-choreographed. Still, he slightly underacts in the crying scene and the one in which he kills the butcher and his children. Playing ruthless villains, Yu Wang and Kara Hui deliver flawless performances. Their characters, albeit monochrome, look eerily menacing.

As for my suggestions for improvement, some insignificant details can be trimmed and Liu Jin-xi’s change can be further developed. Despite these minor flaws, the movie grabs me from beginning to end, not only because of the adrenalin-pumping action, but also the well-developed characters that the audience cares about. Featuring a creative mix of different genres as well as a fine balance between drama and action, Wu Xia is so far the best Hong Kong movie I have watched in 2011.

Kenji Chan

24
七月

《分手說愛你》

   Posted by: admin    in 來稿, 影評試影室, 香港影評人協會

《分手說愛你》算是近年難得一見的港產,它出來的效果不是完美的,甚至可以說是毀多於譽,然而它敢於踏出嘗試的第一步,鄭丹瑞縱橫娛樂圈廿載有多仍敢於坦白表示試拍實驗電影,不像 《翡翠明珠》一類垃圾電影,這一次的誠意,是真的值得支持。

先談毀。毀一,是它完全不脫港產式的煽情。近兩小時的電影,近半以上的時間都是喊腑喊忽的。情感最怕露盡,香港電影三十年,不但沒有走出這個致命的錯誤,反而越來越露骨,變成一地之風格,這種婆媽劇,只適合師奶阿毛,走不出國際的。此片似乎怕不夠煽情,要演員不停哭,搏命哭,狼來多了,情感反而薄弱,眼淚只會徒添反感。例如結尾房祖名失控掟爛人家店舖的電腦,薛海琪最終決定不去巴塞,導演以為是情感昇華的橋段,其實是失控的過火劇情。

毀二,是把一些現代男女的故事拉雜成篇。首先,現代男女的感情十分冷漠,根本沒有入戲的價值,拍出了實感,也滲不出戲味。電影是藝術,藝術需要天馬行空,一味寫實,就好像相片之於圖畫,相片可以百分百照出現實,卻沒有圖畫的美感。另外,以幾個故事構成電影,讓人物間無論情感與人物性格都顯得散渙,無法讓觀眾投入,觀眾像在看兩個精神分裂的人在談情。房祖名的角色,一開始是個死不認錯的人,讓兩者有着很大的隔膜,但問題到後來卻好像沒了。而房祖名最初是個吊兒郎當之徒,後來卻忽然成了情聖,這種轉變只會令觀眾覺得,他們的愛情是不成熟的,而不是導演想帶出的悲慘。

而電影的譽,是導演敢於嘗試玩橋段,有點外國電影慣用的風格,使電影多了層次感。感情是依然薄弱的,然而橋段依然可取。雖然,它並沒有電影內的那段 感情變得豐富,即是愛情還愛情,扭橋還扭橋,沒有融合而演成精彩。這是可惜的,也是可取的,自古成功在嘗試,在一個充滿限制和商業主導的影壇裡,能跨出這艱辛的一步,已是十分難得的一大步。

戲內兩位主角都同樣用心,觀眾不難感受到二人的努力,而演出也是具說服力的。可惜的是煽情的劇本,白費了二人的心血

Jam